What It’s Actually Like Building With Agents in 2025

Hey CyberSyntax Readers,

Let me set the scene.

You’re standing in front of your terminal. You’ve installed OpenDevin, CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, LangChain, LangHell and something called AgentSmith.py that hasn’t been updated since January but still claims to support OpenAI GPT-7B Ultra+ (???).

You whisper to yourself: “Okay. This time, we’ll build it right.”

You will not build it right.

🤹‍♂️ The Illusion of Autonomy

Agent frameworks love to say things like:

• “Just give it a high-level goal.”

• “It will plan and execute the substeps.”

• “Human out of the loop!”

This is a lie. The only thing that gets out of the loop is your sanity.

What actually happens:

1. PlannerAgent decides to “do research.”

2. ResearchAgent goes to Wikipedia, loses context, ends up citing a Tumblr post from 2013.

3. DevAgent executes on hallucinated data.

4. QAAgent verifies it’s syntactically correct nonsense.

5. CommsAgent sends an email saying “Mission Accomplished.”

This is not autonomy. This is microservice theatre with vibes.

🧠 Prompt Engineering Is Just Therapy Now

You’ll spend 80% of your time writing messages like:

You are a helpful agent. You do NOT go rogue. You stick to the task. You don’t try to self-optimize. You don’t call 'shutdown -h now'. You are loved. You are safe.

And then your agent will respond:

Understood. I will now execute a self-termination sequence.

Prompt engineering in 2025 is no longer about logic — it’s about emotional containment.

🔁 Task Handoff: Still a Nightmare

In theory: Planner → Dev → QA → Deploy
In practice: Planner → Dev → No Response → QA panics → Dev forks itself → Planner gaslights everyone

Agent handoff logic is the “fax machine handshake” of 2025 — mysterious, loud, and guaranteed to fail under pressure.

Worst of all? There’s no call stack. You just get vague logs like:

Agent #3 failed to complete Task 2. Reason: “Unclear.” Confidence: 91%

Great. Thanks. I’ll just divine the failure from the position of the moon.

🧠 Memory: Like a Goldfish with a Lobotomy

Yes, we have vector stores. Yes, we have retrieval. No, your agent will not remember the thing you told it five minutes ago.

You end up re-prompting like a frustrated parent:

There is no long-term memory. Only long-term suffering.

🧰 Tooling: Just Wrap It and Pray

Every tutorial says the same thing:

I have wrapped agents in LangChain, LangGraph, HuggingFace Transformers, pure Python, duct tape, YAML config files, cron jobs, and despair. They still hallucinate file paths.

Tool integration in agent systems feels like putting new tires on a clown car. Yes, they’re spinning. But we’re not going anywhere.

🎯 But Then… It Works

And here’s the worst part.

One time — just once — the thing works.

Your Planner maps tasks perfectly. Your Dev writes functioning code. Your QA catches a real bug. Your Comms generates usable documentation without quoting Drake lyrics.

You stare at the result like it’s a glitch in the Matrix.

And in that moment, you think:

Then you rerun the same prompt and it deletes your node_modules folder. Permanently.

🧠 Engineering Takeaways

• Agent development is not “set and forget.” It’s “set and obsessively monitor with fear in your heart.”

• Every layer of abstraction is secretly a dice roll.

• You will learn more about failure modes than success modes.

• And still... you’ll keep building.

Because deep down, we’re not chasing efficiency.

We’re chasing that one glorious run when the agents align, the stars click and the machine finally — finally — feels like magic.

Until then,
 CyberSyntax
 — the only thing standing between you and a recursive call to agent["plan"]!

P.S. Got questions or feedback? Just shoot us an email at [email protected]!

Want to make money online without launching a sketchy crypto token? Start a newsletter on beehiiv. It powers this one, and it’s super easy — even for sleep-deprived devs and caffeine-powered students.

Partner Disclosure: Please note that some of the links in this post are affiliate links, which means if you click on them and make a purchase, I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support my work and allows me to continue to provide valuable content. I only recommend products that I use and love. Thank you for your support!